Friday, December 12, 2008

Reflection


After my first semester taking education courses, I thought it would be beneficial to write some thoughts about what I have learned over the semester. I learned a lot of information regarding good teaching, testing, writing IEP's, parent-teacher relationships and much more. The main discovery that I had was that I truly want to be a teacher. Even with all of the stuff we have to do to graduate and get a license, I still am feeling confident that I am meant to be a teacher.

I've been doing a lot of thinking about my major lately: Music Major, Education Minor, Special Ed. Endorsement. I think that music and education should really both be majors. I believe that Education comes first. Meaning that I want to be a teacher who uses music as a tool for teaching students life-lessons, math, history, etc. Of course I want my students to be good musicians, but I'd rather know that I helped them be better students than knowing that I helped them sing a song.

I just thought I would share some of these thoughts with my fellow Music majors and ed. psych. students.

Teacher of the Year goes to...


At the beginning of the semester, we were given an assignment to write a speech if we won teacher of the year. This is what I came up with:


I am deeply honored to be chosen as teacher of the year. I owe this award to my students. Over the past twenty years I have learned so much from them, and for that I am grateful. They taught me to listen to them, accept them, relate to them and most of all: care about them. There isn’t one specific thing that makes a great teacher; however, some key components are to listen learn, and inspire. John Cattan Dana said it best when he said: “Who dares to teach must never cease to learn.”
We are shaping our next generation of doctors, teachers, and so on. How are students able to discover themselves if we never inspire them? If we never push them? I believe in challenging my students. By challenging, I do not mean I give out more homework or ask them to spend more time practicing, but rather I make my students think. I challenge their opinions and ideas. This makes them think critically and able to support their beliefs. Being able to do this is one of the first steps to self-discovery. Dan Rather once said, “The dream begins with a teacher who believes in you, who tugs and pushes and leads you to the next plateau, sometimes poking you with a sharp stick called ‘truth’.”
This leads me to my next point: never give up on a student. It is so easy to write-off a student when they don’t show up for class, don’t do their work, or worst-of-all: drop-out. As much as we, as teachers, need to challenge our students, we also need to be prepared to be challenged. I have had to deal with students with many temperaments, personalities and diverse home lives. So often we don’t spend enough time getting to know our student, which is key to reaching out to these challenging students. There are so many reasons that a student may not be working hard at school and I try to figure out that reason so that I may make adjustments to better my students’ education.
When I started I barely had any students in my extra-curricular choir. I did; however, have many students in my required choir. It was very apparent who wanted to be there, and who didn’t. It’s important to keep your class fun, engaging and challenging. I did this by assigning research projects, having individual sight-reading test, and then allowing the students to share their favorite music with the class. I also got the parents involved. I realized that so many parents don’t realize the importance of music, and therefore don’t encourage their children to try hard in music. Once I built up the parent group, I noticed a huge difference in the children. They were more prepared, much more excited for performances and the attendance for performances greatly increased which, of course, made them perform better. I am proud to say that I now have multiple extra-curricular choirs that have competed in competitions and have received high marks.
Once again, I need to thank my students and parents for making me a better teacher. I only hope that I have somehow impacted the lives of my students. I close with a quote by Jacques Barzun that has been my inspiration for the past twenty years: “In teaching you cannot see the fruits of a day’s work. It is invisible and remains so, maybe for twenty years.”

What determines good teaching?


On Wednesday we were given an article about Michelle Rhee (the chancellor running the District of Columbia Public Schools). She has a very tough approach to battling the District of Columbia. She believes that creativity is nice, but if children can't read, the teachers aren't doing their job. I agree that teachers need to focus on reading for sure, but teachers should be creative in their ways of teaching. Creativity becomes a problem when it interferes with the content the students should be learning.


Rhee also believes that good teachers should be paid more based on test scores. I actually really like this idea. I get frustrated with teachers who are protected by ten year but are really unmotivated. If I knew that there wasn't job security and I could get paid more, I would be extremely motivated to be a better teacher. There has been a lot of controversy over her measure of evaluating teachers and what makes good teachers. A lot of people say that there is more teaching than just test scores. I tend to agree with this; however, if teachers are doing a good job teaching (not teaching to the test), test scores will improve. Yes, there will be the few students who do poorly because they are not good test takers, but there should be an overall improvement in scores. Rhee brings up a good point that most districts evaluate teachers before they even start teaching. They want teachers who are certified, who have a master degree and many other pieces of information that can't really predict how one will do as a teacher. Rhee explains that teachers should be evaluated after two years to determine who are the good teachers. I like this idea because it allows the teacher to reflect over the past years, and also will allow districts to keep good teachers and lose the ones who aren't.


There will continue to be a constant struggle to determine what makes good teaching. It will be interesting to see what is to come for the district of Columbia Schools.

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Dots and Oreos?


This past Monday night, I walked into the lecture hall and was told to close my eyes along with my fellow students. A dot was place on our foreheads. We were then told to get with our groups without using sign language or speaking. After we found our groups, Oreos were handed out. The group with the most people (and who were sitting in the back), got the least amount of Oreos. The group with the least amount of people (sitting in the front) were given the most amount of Oreos. There was a middle-sized group (sitting in the middle of the lecture hall) with an average amount of Oreos. We started to wonder if we should eat the Oreos or save them until we were told we could eat them. Our group (the mid-sized one) decided we each can eat one. The activity proceeded with a small group of people from the other class giving a lecture. I still didn't get what was going on.

The last half of the class we spent discussing about what this activity was about. When we were told to get in our groups, we automatically assumed that our groups were supposed to be based on the dots on our foreheads. We weren't told to get in our groups with the same dot color, we just have been conditioned to do so. Also, why did the group with the most Oreos not share with the large group with the least amount of Oreos? The thought never occurred to them.

The main point to this activity was to point out that we as teachers need to be careful how we assess our students. It is often said that within the first week teachers know what their students will be getting in their class, but how? Better yet, how do we prevent this? It is so easy to grade based off of how we expect them to do (or want them to do). There are times where teachers make excuses for their students: oh they must have had some troubles, I know they can do better so I'll just give them an A anyways. I've seen this done before.

As a future music educator, I will have to be extremely careful about my grading. I will have to pay attention to not favor one student over the other because of the musical abilities. I'll have to grade them based on other factors which doesn't necessarily include how well they sing. I know I will struggle with this when I first begin teaching, but I will eventually come up with a consistent way of grading.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Chalk part 2


I found "Chalk" a very entertaining movie. It was a humerous, but accurate interpretation of what issues teachers face. I especially noted Mr. Stroope as he struggled through his first year of teaching.

I am happy to report that Mr. Lowrey learns to manage the classroom. It just goes to show that the first year of teaching is a learning experience (as is any year). He started off the year not being respected, having troubles with classroom management, and ended the year with an overall good relationship with the students. I learned a lot about how to establish a good relationship with my students from watching Mr. Lowrey struggle. One way that he did this was to find a way to relate to his students. He let the students help in study for the "Spelling Hornet." The students cheered him on and wanted him to win. He also went and visited a parent. I don't think it was the best idea to get drunk with a parent, but he did try to a establish a good parent/teacher relationship to improve one of his students' behavior. He took the parents advice to be more firm and it worked. He was able to gain control of his classroom and he seemed rather pleased with himself.

Saturday, November 29, 2008

The Last Lecture


After reading Randy Pausch's "The Last Lecture," I felt very inspired to not only follow my own dreams, but to enable the dreams of my students. I guess that is my main dream: I want to be a teacher who inspires her students, let them know that nothing is out of reach. In his book, Randy Pausch gave advice on how to overall be an effective teacher.

Here is a list I have comprised about advice he gives to teachers:
1) He mentioned that we need to look for the best in everyone, we just have to wait longer. He quoted his hero from Disney Imagineering saying that "If you wait long enough, people will surprise and impress you." I might have to be patient with my students and colleauges to discover what positive contribution will be to the class.
2)"If at First you don't succeed ....try a cliche" He said that students don't always know them, and are greatly inspired by them. I plan to read some inspirations to my students whenever I can fit it in (hopefully daily).
3)Teach your student that "Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted" I need to let my students know that it is okay to make mistakes. Mistakes and failures are learning opportunities and we should present them as such.
4)Make every moment a learning opportunity. After receiving ten year, Randy took his team to Disney World and along the way they topped at universitied to visit computer reseatch groups. Just goes to show that we can incorporate learning with entertainment.
5)You cannot give your students self-esteems "it's something they have to build.....You give them something they can't do, they work hard until they find they can do it, and you just repeat the process."
6)"Brick walls are there for a reason. They give us a chance to show how badly we want something." We want our students to succeed, but sometimes we have to go through a lot for this to happen.
7) Manage your time wisely and pass this on to your students.
8)"In the end, educators bes serve student by helping them be more self-reflective."

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Chalk


After watching the first half of Chalk, I fell in love with the movie. It mixed realistic situations that teachers go through with humor. Although I was laughing through the majority of the movie, I found myself analyzing all of the characters and their situations.

Mr. Stroope is the teacher wanting "teacher of the year," but he faces difficulty differentiating between the students being his friend and being a disciplinarian. Thus far, the movie depicts that he struggles with organization, preparation (turning in lessons plans on time) and disciplining his students. The strange thing is that he reminds me of some of my teachers in high school. They were fun, but I didn't learn a whole lot because they weren't very prepared.

Coach Webb is considered to be the "pushy" one. She seems to engage her student well and offers a wide variety of activities. However, she seems to cross the line when it comes to co-worker relations. She pulled a teacher out of her classroom to point out that the teacher was not enforcing the 'tardiness' rule. This is not her place. If she notices that a teacher isn't enforcing a rule, she should speak to a principal, who can talk to the teacher. I think it was demeaning to pull that teacher out of her classroom. The students notice what goes on and they will pick up on what teacher is well-respected.

Mr. Lowrey is the history teacher who doesn't have a teaching degree and does not have classroom management skills. The good thing is that he knows this. It is good that he is attempting to get better at managing the students. I look forward to see if he becomes one of the better teachers at the school.

These are my thoughts on Chalk right now. More is to come as a watch the ending.